Here’s the video from my most recent oral argument in the Second District.
This one involved a paragraph 22 argument and the relatively unique concept of “invited error.”
My favorite parts: (i) when the judges flat-out told the bankster lawyer that his first argument was not good; (ii) my exchanges with Judge Salario regarding the Milam decision, where I was put in the exceedingly rare position of arguing the content of my still-pending Motion for Rehearing in Milam with the judge who wrote the opinion (because that argument also pertained to the issues raised in this appeal).
Mark Stopawww.stayinmyhome.com
The post Invited Error, Arguing Milam appeared first on Stopa Law Firm.
